The second thing we need to realize about Gen. 1 is that it harmonizes with origins science, but it is not a scientific textbook. Let's take a closer look at both halves of this statement.
Gen. 1 harmonizes with origins science. There is no contradiction between what is recorded here and what science has discovered about the origin of the universe and life on earth. Rather, there is agreement about the most important issues.
The universe began at a point in time. For centuries, many scientists held that the universe was eternal, but now we know this is not the case. Through a variety of means, we can trace the universe back to a moment in time when all of its mass was condensed into a single point of incredible density. This mass exploded, and the aftermath of this explosion is the universe. This is the so-called "Big Bang."
Of course, the Bible also tells us that universe had a beginning. It also explains what science could never explain – how this mass came into being, what caused it to explode, and why such order has resulted from this explosion" "In the beginning, God created the heavens and the earth."The earth is very old. Solid scientific evidence indicates that the earth and the universe are several billion years old (e.g., red shift; radioactive dating of rocks). Unfortunately, many Christians have dogmatically stated that Genesis says the earth is only a few thousand years old. The classic presentation of this position was formulated by Bishop Ussher, who calculated the genealogies back from Jesus and decided that the universe was created during the week of October 18-24, 4004 BC, with Adam created on October 23. Although young earth creationists have moved this date back by several thousand years, they still have a problem with both scientific evidence and the biblical text.
First of all, biblical genealogies are not exhaustive. Careful comparison of the biblical genealogies reveals that they only name key ancestors to establish descent. The Hebrew terms are general, meaning "became the ancestor of" or "descended from" (MORE LATER). In other words, the Bible doesn't tell us how long ago the first humans were created.
Second, it is not at all clear that Gen. 1 is describing creation in 6 successive 24-hour days. There is evidence from the text that Moses is using the word "day" (yom) to refer to a period of time longer than 24 hours.New life forms emerged suddenly, followed by gradual development. Darwin postulated that the fossil record would show a gradual development of simpler to more complex life forms. But the fossil record shows something very different – sudden "irruptions" of new, more complex life-forms, followed by long periods of development of those life forms. This better fits the Genesis 1 record, assuming it is describing an old earth.
Humans are more recent than most other life forms. Unlike most ancient Near Eastern myths which placed humans before other life forms, the biblical creation account is confirmed by the fossil record, which tells us that humans have appeared very recently in geological time.
Having surveyed how the biblical account harmonizes with origins science, Andrew Parker, Research Leader of the National History in London, said: "Without expecting to find anything, I discovered a whole series of parallels between the creation story on the Bible's first page and the modern, scientific account of life's history . . . How did the writer of this page come to write this creation account? . . . I must admit, rather nervously as a scientist averse to entertaining such an idea, that the evidence that the writer of the opening page of the Bible was divinely inspired is strong."Having said the above, we must also understand that Gen. 1 is not a scientific textbook. It is unfair to impose upon it standards of specificity and perspective that are appropriate to the scientific discipline. Consider these differences:
It is a very general summary, focusing on WHO (God's role in creation) and WHY rather than a detailed scientific treatise that focuses on WHEN this happened and HOW (the secondary causes involved).
It uses "observational" language – it describes things from the perspective and interest of a human observer on the earth. We do this every day when we speak of the sun "rising." This may explain why the sun, moon and stars are described on the fourth day (i.e., their appearance through the atmosphere).
It is highly selective. It focuses on matters that were known by and were of interest to the original (human) audience. We do this every day when our news focuses on events that pertain primarily to human/western affairs. This explains why microscopic sea life is omitted, as well as many other things.
What does Genesis 1 teach us?
God is revealed through – but distinct from – God's creation. Just as we can learn something about the artist by studying his art works, we can learn something about the Creator by studying His creation (Rom. 1:20; Ps. 19:1; COMPUTER VIRUS). Therefore, atheism is false. But if the canvas was burned up, the artist would remain. In the same way, God exists independently from His creation. Therefore, pantheism, animism, and polytheism (religions which dominated the land into which Moses' audience was headed) are also false.
Humans alone are created in God's image. Humans are like God in a way that other life-forms are not. Humans "image" or represent God on earth. We will unpack this in more detail next week, but consider what these verses emphasize about us.
We have benevolent dominion over nature (1:26,28). This dominion is to care for nature, not rape or exploit it. The charge that the Bible gave western people to permission to exploit nature is untrue. Here and elsewhere, the Bible calls on humans to be humane in their treatment of animals, for example (Sabbath rest; ox and mule; muzzled threshing). Such exploitation (usually motivated out of monetary greed) is a fallen perversion of biblical dominion. Yet this means that human life is of greater value than non-human life. It means that, within proper restraints, the rest of creation was given to humans to use and enjoy. Therefore, humans may domesticate animals, practice agriculture, exterminate roaches and termites from houses, kill viruses and bacteria that cause sickness, use trees for housing materials and furniture, etc.
We demonstrate God's personal unity & diversity (1:26,27). Most conservative biblical scholars agree that the "Us" and "Our" refer to God Himself, because only God creates. Furthermore, in 1:27 "God" (Elohim) is a plural noun, but "created" (bara) is a singular verb. God is one in essence/attributes, but is more than one Person who love one another (Jn. 17:24). The interaction of these Persons resulted in the creation of life and other persons. Humans are to image this aspect of God through their marital union (see 2:22-25) which brings forth more persons.
We can receive & respond to God's propositional communication (1:27; 2:16; 3:8). You are created by God, created in God's image, created above all else to relate to this speaking God. God initiates communication with us (through His written and spoken Word), and the purpose of our lives is to respond to what God says. To reject or ignore His communication leads to death – but to respond to His communication leads to life (Jn. 8:12; 2 Cor. 4:6).
Conclusion
NEXT WEEK: Genesis 2 – "What does it mean to be human?"
QUESTIONS & COMMENTS